Black Skin, White Masks

Time and time again, Obama has proven that what he most identifies with is America, specifically White America. Last week, he traveled to Ghana and gave a speech to the Ghanaian people, urging them to accept responsibility for the fate of their nation, castigating the continent (don't forget people, Africa is a continent, not a country) for corruption and blaming their ills on colonialism. I will admit that his argument has a modicum of legitimacy, but it was absolutely repulsive in its blatant disregard for historical analysis.We have heard this same argument before: Africans must stop blaming us and take responsibility for themselves. However, this is not something that a descendant of Africa should be stating. I would expect to hear something like this on Fox News, and his speech has only further confirmed my opinion that he does not identify with African anymore than Bill O'Reilly does. He has used Africa as a publicity stunt to showcase his oratorical skills and feign like he will actually put forth progressive policies for Africa, knowing that the people of Africa view him as their child, and are thus more receptive of him than they have been of any other U.S. president.
One point of contention that I have is Obama's emphasis on corruption. Every society has corruption, the United States not excluded, but because it is a wealthy nation, it's permissible to be corrupt. As a subtopic of corruption, it should be admitted that the United States has a long policy of rewarding corruption. Let's face it: The United States, and the white world in general, do not want a strong and vibrant Africa. A strong and vibrant Africa cannot have its resources expropriated and exploited. A strong and vibrant Africa would have no need to placate its former colonizers. If we wanted a strong and vibrant Africa, we would not have sent in the CIA to assassinate Patrice Lumumba and overthrow Kwame Nkrumah. These men represented a strong and vibrant Africa, and they were shot down. We need to be honest. Whenever a politician has advocated a strong and vibrant Africa, they are isolated and denigrated. We have never given Africa an opportunity to fulfill its potential because if Africa were to be reborn, Europe, like a parasite that can no longer feed off its host, would die. Whenever Africa tried to stand, we brought in our guns and shot the people down.
If we want to discuss the reasons why Africa is in shambles, talk about Christopher Columbus. Talk about Britain. Or France. Or Spain. Or Portugal. Or just about every major industrialized nation in Europe. Talk about the Berlin Conference. Talk about how Africa was divided like it was a pie, with Britain getting a piece, France another, and so forth. Talk about how when the Africans tried to take responsibility and liberate themselves, the Europeans brought with them guns, torture chambers, concentration camps, etc. Talk about how King Leopold of Belgium butchered ten million Congolese.Talk about how the CIA assassinated leaders, and how our wonderful leaders kept funneling money to rebel groups to continue wars so we can loot the resources undetected. But........ Obama neglects to mention this. Could it be that the same people who supported his presidency are the same ones who continue all of this dirty business? Could it be that the new masters look a lot like the old ones, and instead of that old-time religion to keep the slaves in place, we mesmerize people with the carrot of capitalism and all its accompanying riches, dangling in front of their noses? Could it be that we black Americans, many of us house slaves, are so desperate to hold onto our positions, we ignore when the master tells the field slaves to be more responsible, and wait for another handout? Could it be that we were duped because Obama was black, and that automatically means that he's for us? Right?
I find it very odd that Obama bent over backwards to remind the Middle Eastern people how we engineered a coup to overthrown one of their democratically elected leaders, how he wants to establish a new relationship with them, and how he's not afraid of Muslims, etc. Maybe he failed to so the same for Africans because, as someone mentioned, he knew his color provided a buffer for criticism. He takes advantage of the fact that because of his color, he can do all the heinous things Bush did and get away with it, because he has such a nice smile and he's black and articulate. What more could you ask for? And besides, who really cares what the Africans think anyway? We all know that the Western world has little respect for the African people, only for their resources, and what better way to deliver that same disrespect, this time wrapped in a smiling, chocolate package? For those who say I'm being cynical, just imagine the criticism that would be leveled at any white public figure who might say the same thing.
And then of course, so typical of American presidents, is the paternalism. You know, the we-need-to-teach-these-peo

ple-of-color-how-a-real-democracy-works type of paternalism. I think most people know how democracy works, and how much audacity does it take for a person to lecture others about their country? Obama would never go to a white nation and do that. And he of course talked about the exploitation of resources, coincidentally leaving much of the Western World uninvolved considering how Europe's wealth is basically stolen from the backs of the very people he criticizes.
Far from saying that I know everything, I have one piece of advice that I believe is very crucial. It's similar to the lesson learned in kindergarten: Leave people alone. (Well, substitute countries for people). If Columbus had heeded that advice, there would be United States of America to terrorize other countries, and I think many other nations would be grateful for that. This land would still be populated with the indigenous peoples. If people heeded that advice, millions of people with African descent would not be here, with some millions imprisoned. If only. Because the truth is, Europeans have destroyed this world. Not singlehandedly, but they have contributed to the overwhelming majority of suffering this world experiences today. Their desire to control everything, their greed, their desire for dominance, their meddling, has led to Africa's misery. It has given them famine, genocide, poverty, etc., and now the descendants of the colonizers have elected a black man to represent them to the descendants of the people who have been colonized, who technically speaking, he should have far more in common with. Oh, the irony. If he really wanted to someone to lecture, go to Britain, and tell them that there streets were built off the backs of slaves. Go to France, and marvel at their wealth, and ask them where it came from. But, no popular politician will do it, and surely not the president. Because, and this may be painful for many of us of African descent to believe, but we identify more with America and the "civilized world" than we do with Ghana, or the Sudan, or Zimbabwe.
Obama may have alluded to a point which he did not intend to. One of the most common excuses I hear from people of European descent for today's state of affairs is, "How can I be blamed for something that my people, or ancestors did?" Good point, however, the descendants of these European colonizers have reaped the benefits of the exploitation of the African people, and while I'm not saying they have to go out and save the world, the least they can do is be honest. And for a politician of Obama's stature, this is especially important. He's the first black president of the United States, and the only one I know of who has a rabid cult following disguised as progressive politics. Many people who like Obama defend every his every statement, and when one is mesmerized by someone, it is harder to be critical of them. Thus, we have many people who take his statements has undeniable truth and have a group of people who believe that the state of affairs is Africa's fault, and that whatever happens to the people there, is just, well, mismanagement, rather than a concerted effort to exploit the people and resources there. This is the reason politicians remain dangerous. They have every media tool at their disposal, and they have built-in audiences who may not have either the time or the inclination to analyze their statements, so they just accept, and once a person accepts someone's ideology, it becomes difficult to criticize what they do in respect to that ideology. Make no mistake about it, Obama is for empire and imperialism. Otherwise, he would not have become president. The corporations and the media (aren't they one and the same?) have given him their endorsement because he has aligned his interests with theirs, and they believe he will be a faithful representative, and so far, he has not disappointed them.
Know that every U.S. president, Obama's predecessors and successors, has to identify with the white world. There is just no other way to get elected. I think in the euphoria of Obama being elected, we have forgotten history, we have forgotten a lot of important things, and we let style and appearance trump substance. While simultaneously rejoicing at Obama's presidency both because of the fact that he was black (well, overwhelmingly because of the fact that he was black) and because of the fact that he was a Democrat (one of the "good guys"), we rejected those presidential candidates who did not receive the mainstream stamp of approval, regardless of whether their views were conducive to our interests. This means that while we were glad he was black, he needed to have the white stamp of approval to be considered legitimate. This desperation for acceptance has far reaching consequences, the least of which is our lack of vigilance. But, maybe Obama is symbolic of many black people in the Western world. Maybe we have black skin with white masks. Maybe we identify with the white world more than we identify with people who resemble ourselves. Maybe we need a Back to Africa movement, at least metaphorically. What do I know? I know that we cannot forget history, and his speech seemed to be a willful attempt to if not to forget history, then to ignore it.

The Second Middle Passage

I think that this may just be me being melodramatic, but I am extremely disturbed by the rise of celebrity adoptions, particularly adoption of African children. I foresee an entire generation of African children being unwillingly snatched from their homes and cultures, to be taken to America and surrounded by European culture.To me, this is reminiscent of the Middle Passage. One big difference is that the conditions of the Middle Passage were horrendous and the ultimate purpose was profit. In this modern day Middle Passage, however, the purpose is to alleviate and assuage white guilt over the theft and destruction of Africa.
I will use Madonna as an example. It is undeniable that she has used her fame and money to completely cower the Malawian government to let her adopt a child. Many argue that the child's parents have abandoned her, but that is just what the media says. People do not keep in mind that in many cases, the parents take their children to orphanages because they can no longer care for their children, and sending them to an orphanage is preferable to starvation. Maybe we should have a bit more compassion for parents who find themselves in an unenviable situation such as this. For those who assume the position that Madonna is doing a charitable thing by adopting this child, they are right. Her adoption is symbolic and symptomatic of all the things wrong with charity, particularly western charity. Instead of seeking to create sustainability, we seek to uphold our ego by "helping" destitute people. If we really cared about "abandoned" African children, why don't we strive to create conditions in which the children will not be abandoned in the first place?
Not only that, but I have never seen a celebrity receive extreme press coverage for adopting a white child. I can think of a few celebrities who have clandestinely adopted white children, but you will never hear about that. Some argue that the reason celebrities adopt children of color is because they feel like no one else will want them. I find it strange, however, that oftentimes, these children come from countries with lax adoption laws, making it easier, to adopt an African or Asian child, rather than a European child. And of course, we cannot forget the role ego plays into it. How can one criticize you for saving a child's life, allegedly? You look kind, forgiving, people become so distracted by all your adoptions and charity work they condone your less favorable actions. Adopting a child is the ultimate public relations move.
Also, I find it interesting that none of these celebrities adopt older children, and when I mean older children, I'm being very generous here. Most, if not all, the children adopted are infants. May this be because older children remember their families and their culture? Because of this, older children are more difficult to mold into the image of their parents. Thus, celebrities often adopt infants. Infants really have no memory of their families or their cultures, and therefore, the process of assimilating African children into a white world is facilitated. Does one really think that an African child can really understand their identity in a white family? I recall someone saying that Angelina Jolie has tutors that teach her children about their respective cultures. I find this quite farcical. I do not think one can teach a child a culture. One has to live in that culture, be immersed in it, absorb it. Culture has to be lived. It cannot be encapsulated in a book and regurgitated through a teacher.
Unfortunately, I believe that if this continues, we may have a generation of children that are a lot like many of my former classmates who deny their links to Africa and see the Continent as nothing but a barren wasteland. Perhaps I am being too pessimistic, but I feel like I am a witness to the demise of a race, a witness to cultural genocide. This is reminiscent of the kidnapping of Native American children by the Canadian and American governments. Their culture was stolen and considered inferior, and maybe many of these white people have good intentions, I'm sure they do, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
But alas, adoption may be the only alternative to a life of poverty, or so we say. We would rather leave the job of rebuilding to the wealthy, and it is just more convenient to let them adopt our children rather than raise them ourselves.Why not use the money that would be spent on nannies, tutors, and cooks for the child to sponsor that child and members of the family that would want to raise the child? That way the child would be taken care of, maybe not living an opulent lifestyle, but would be provided for, yet not ripped apart from his/her culture and family.Or the next best thing would be for more black families to adopt black children. I understand that many families are under financial strain, so the responsibility could be born by those with the financial means to take care of others. I would love the day when Beyonce or Oprah (I dislike them both, but better them than Madonna) adopt a black child. Until then, we will have the Madonnas and the Jolies gallivanting across the world, picking their choice of cute, "exotic" children to raise.

The Prayer to End All Prayers

Dear God,

Since you're all all-knowing and all powerful, I assume that there is no need to pray to you anymore, seeing as how you know everything I want and need and can ever want and need. I assume that because of this, by now, there is no need to pray to you anymore because you have already made your mind concerning whatever it is that I ask you for. So why do people pray? I heard it makes them feel better, but then again, so does ecstasy and porn. Besides, it's only a matter of time before you start to feel better anyway. Well, never mind. Why did I ask that question? Since you know everything, you would know that I would ask this question, and you decided not to answer this prayer, and since you decided not to answer this prayer, there is no need to pray to you (at least about this). Sometimes I feel a bit silly praying to you, kind of like I'm asking the Tooth Fairy to put quarters under my pillow, or for Santa Claus to bring me a Christmas gift. But then again, I never believed in Santa Claus. My dad burst that bubble early and told me that Santa committed suicide, kind of like you did, except it was more like human sacrifice, but if you can't believe in the guy who is supposed to give you gifts every year, how can you believe in the guy who is supposed to give you eternal salvation, with no record to show for it. Hell, at least Santa brought gifts. All you offer is the promise to be able to do as much evil as I can in the world, and before I die, I can repent and say that I believe in you, and I'll go to Heaven, and if not, well......... we know what happens. So I just want to say that God, this is a very tempting offer, one I'm almost willing to take, except that I realized that when I die, I kind of just...die. I can't really experience death. So as much as that giant bonfire known as Hell scares me, I realize that I'll probably never experience it, and so, I'm not scared. But why bring me to this world? You're all knowing. You know if I'm going to Hell or not. But, I'll keep praying to you.I just want to let you know that, I'm not your enemy. You kind of have this Godfather mentality, like you don't wipe out everyone, just your enemies. I mean if you succeed with this full scale genocide, you know, putting everyone who doesn't believe you into Hell, that's like billions of people. You will have put every mass murderer to shame. And I can't compete. So, let's make a deal. You have a limited time frame,which will be my entire life, to work miracles and all that, and maybe I'll believe in the Trinity. The only problem is, how will I know you won't renege on the deal? I mean , I can only really meet you when I'm dead, and like I said before, I can't really experience death, so you have to offer me something else. So like Corleone (hey, I'm coming from a place that I feel you can understand) said, "I'm gonna make you an offer you can't refuse," but until then God, until you can really give me an offer I can't refuse, the only Trinity may be me, myself, and I.

The Folly of Religion: Part 1- Christianity

Now I realize that there really is no way to insult religion without also insulting the people who follow that particular religion, but I have some serious qualms with religion. I have grown up in a Christian household for most of my life, so I believe that I have the legitimacy to critique certain aspects of religion.
First of all, I have an issue with the whole concept of heaven and hell. I remember when I was a child, in Sunday School, I was told that everyone who did not believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God would be condemned to an eternity of condoned torture known as Hell that makes Guantanamo Bay look like the candy factory. So suppose that I was a decent person, but I have a fairly minute disagreement with God, namely, let's say, and I do believe this, that Jesus never existed, and that he is not the Son of God. If the former premise is true, then the latter is a moot point. I hold the following position: if there were adequate, plausible evidence that established the existence of Jesus, I would be inclined to believe it. However, since there is not, with much of the supposed evidence being refuted when it was realized that many of the writings that were used to prove his existence were fraudulent interpolations., I think that my lack of belief is a rational position.
Also, there is just the fact that I have never believed in Jesus. The whole story was not credible to me, even when I was a young child. For a fairly long period in my life, I was tormented by the fact that people around me believed in Jesus, and because I did not, I would go to Hell. Now, I'm completely confused because there is no evidence to corroborate the existence of Hell (or Heaven). I mean, if dead people could be resurrected, then maybe they could attest to its existence, but since not, we have no way of knowing. And then, there is just the simple fact that Heaven is not a pleasant place to be. The way Heaven was always presented to me was a place where time did not exist and God would be worshiped forever. I'm sorry, but that sounds like slavery to me. There is no way, and I reiterate, no way, I will want to worship at the altar of anyone's feet. I don't even like myself that much to just worship and exult myself.
This is just my personal belief. I believe that God, Heaven, and Hell are just projections of our desires. We want to be perfect. We strive for perfection, and we believe that this means that we have to be omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, etc. However, there is no such thing as perfection, and even if there were, we have no model to emulate. There is also the contradiction, that while we perceive God to be perfect, we endow him with human qualities, such as jealousy, presumably because the human experience is the only one we can relate to. We feel that if we have all these qualities, then we will be more secure and have more control over our lives. The key aspect of religion is control, which is rooted in our desire for security. We not only want control over ourselves, but we want control over others as well. We want to control others' behavior so that we can control how they behave towards us and affect out quality of life.
I think as humans evolved, we began to feel more insecure, more conscious of our mortality and vulnerability. Like a mother protects her infant, so a God protects his children. It is human to want to feel secure and feel like someone will take care of you. We like to have a safety net. And what better way for a safety net to be than omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. What better safety net than one who callously and brutally destroys your enemies. No one will want to mess with you then! God's wrath, more powerful than any nuclear weapon.
And then there arises the problem of bad things happening to good people, and vice-versa. We want to feel that there is a purpose to everything, that there is a reason for suffering. So we say, well, if you believe in this person and follow his teachings, then after you die, you will go to this magical place where there will be no more suffering, and if not, you will be punished beyond comparison. We like to feel self-righteous, and we like to feel that if we are good, we will be rewarded. A problem with this is that so many people focus on the illusory dreams of a no-suffering afterlife, we neglect the present, the only thing we can be really certain of. And of course, if someone wrongs us, we feel vindicated that they will be condemned. Personally, it's a bit childish, but who said that all humans must be mature?
Another problem I have with religion is just the appearance of purpose. Ever since the beginning of time, we have always wanted to discover the purpose of life, so many religious people say, 'Well, we are alive to praise God in his infinite glory, ' or something along those lines. My issue is this : not only is this completely unappealing, it's slavery, and it's letting someone or something predefine your purpose. Others are a bit better, 'Well, we are here to make the world better for other people.' The flaw with this belief is that it is dependent on the existence of people, but doesn't explain why we were created. We should just be honest. No one really knows. And that's fine. The problem arises when people attempt to impose their beliefs on others, and this is inevitable. Most religions need to gain adherents, or else they will die out. Religions have to recruit, many times forcefully. This is why religion is notorious for violence. I wouldn't be so hostile to religion if it were relatively nonviolent, but so many people have been killed in the name of religion. If it were mainly a preference, no problem, but religion had demonstrated a fundamental aspect of human nature. It is a testament to our fear of the unknown and our fear of our demise.

19 Fact-Pinions

1. I have a habit of stealing other people's style. If I like your shoes, I'll go out and buy them. I also stole somebody's handwriting.

2. I think stripping is an art and not everyone can do it. I dislike male strippers, no offense, but you already have a pole between your legs, so what's the point?

3. I love older men. A couple generations is good..maybe it runs in the family. My father is eighteen years older than my mother.

4. I secretly hate white girls with big butts, except if I were to be reincarnated, I would come back as Kim Kardashian. It's not fair, I mean you should have either the butt or the breasts, but she got both

5. I love krumping. I would start a group if someone was interested, it;s nothing but pure emotion

6. I am fascinated by tattoos. I would get once, except I don't have the money to get one, but I have planned my first one:m my whole back covered with the continent of Africa in red, black, and green, with a rising sun, and Audre Lorde's quote: "If I don't define myself for myself, I will be crushed into other people's fantasies and eaten alive."

7. I like to portray myself as a conscious person, but I can't resist a song with a good beat

8. I've always had a desire to smoke a joint, as long as the police don't catch me.

9. I think all the real revolutionaries are either dead, in jail, haven't been born, or in a mental institution

10. I think Malcolm X is one of the sexiest men ever, with the glasses and the beard, and when he delivers a speech.....

11. I think college is bull, I don't understand the purpose. I would love to just dropout and write and learn

12. I think money is one of the worst things that has ever happened to humanity.

13. You know the guy that threw the shoes at George Bush, he should have gotten me to do, I wouldn't have missed

14. John McCain, fifty years ago, could have given Barack Obama a run for his money

15. I can't do people who try to push their religion on others.

16. I secretly wish that I was a bird, or that I was invisible

17. Ever since Aaliyah died, I've been scared to ride on airplanes

18. We're in a recession, so do what you gotta do to get money

19. I think if Jesus were alive, or existed, I would "take up my cross and follow him." Jesus is sexy, and I know that he had locks. And when Judas betrayed him, I would have been the one to comfort him and keep him warm.

Gaza

I know that this is completely random, and maybe no one will respond to this note. This note concerns the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip in Israel. As of right now, millions of people are having their houses bombed and are being starved by the Israelis, with a lot of help from the Palestinians. For those who need some background information about the topic, I will give a brief synopsis: This whole debacle started in 1948 when Jews were given Israel as compensation for the West's complicity in the Holocaust. I am not certain of the exact number, but many Palestinians were forced of their land to make room for the Jews migrating to Israel. To this day, the descendants of these Palestinian refugees have had to suffer. In June 2006, Hamas, an Islamic political party, was democratically elected in the Gaza Strip. Ever since they have been elected, the United States and Israel have sought to undermine them, allegedly because Hamas said that Israel has no right to exist, even though they only want 22% of their original land. You may have heard in the news how Israel is engaging in acts of self-defense because Hamas keeps firing rockets in their territory. Now, I don't know if this is an adequate analogy, but imagine if a toddler was hitting you and kicking you, but only because you attacked the toddler first? Would that toddler be in the wrong? The Israelis have sophisticated technology, loaned to them by the United States, that they have used against the Palestinians. It's just no comparison. Today, I read that the Israelis have invaded Gaza. Now, this is a crisis that has been ongoing. I remember reading last year about how Israel would block humanitarian aid to the Gazans, as a form of collective punishment. It didn't matter that there were children there. It didn't matter if people were on dialysis machines when the Israelis cut off their electricity. None of this mattered. It didn't matter when the Israelis bulldozed Palestinians' homes because they would not move. Approximately eighty percent of the people in Gaza depend on humanitarian aid. People have asked Obama about his thoughts concerning Gaza, and he has sided with the aggressors. I am not trying to bash anyone, I just wanted to make everyone aware of this. Some of you may not know that Cynthia McKinney tried to transfer medical supplies to the Gaza Strip, but her boat was attacked by Israeli troops, and the press basically ridiculed her for trying to ease the Gazans' suffering. For those who don't know much concerning Israel, there is a loooot to learn, but I have posted links at the bottom of this note. If this is not enough, you can google, 'Gaza humanitarian crisis.' Maybe some of you don't care, maybe some of you do, but I think that this is important because we see similar crises happening all over the world, especially in Africa. This is genocide all over again, and we can choose to ignore it if we we wish. Spread this to as many people as you can. I wrote this note because I feel so helpless, and the only reason I feel helpless (I think) is because not enough people know about it. There is strength in numbers.

Among Other Things....

I think I must be the only person alive who is not excited about Barack Obama's presidency, and I usually don't say this too loudly because people don't like to hear this, but I have a huge problem with Obama. I've never really trusted him too much, besides the fact that I believe he talks a lot with his wonderful speeches, but says little. Has anyone asked how much sense it makes to spend over one hundred million dollars on the inauguration, but we're in a recession? Has anyone asked why he supported the seven hundred billion dollar bailout last year, and why he's putting the same people who started this mess in charge? Has anybody questioned him about his alleged cuts in Medicare and Social Security? Has anyone questioned him about trying to extend the war in Afghanistan? Has anyone questioned him about his undying support for Israel? Has anyone questioned him about his support for "the War on Terror?" Has anyone questioned his reasons for appointing Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State,when we know she voted for the Iraq War? Has anyone questioned Obama when he said, "the surge (in Iraq) has worked better than I imagined." (not exact words, but close enough) Has anyone questioned Obama when he said he would support raids into Pakistan, and would not tolerate Iran having nuclear weapons? But this is a man that is supposed to be about peace and change.A leopard doesn't change its spots, and for those who say, "Oh, the people elected him." No they didn't. The electoral college elects him, and let me tell you, sometimes, they pick the opposite of what the people chose. Has anyone said that for someone who is so much about change, his policies are very much close to that of Bush, and what about, him wanting America to lead the world? For those in third world nations, I say, don't get your hopes up. And for those who don't care about foreign policy, I'll say the same thing. What has Obama said about the prison-industrial complex, the war on drugs, etc? The only reason he said something about the economy is because white people are suffering. Black communities have always had a high unemployment rate. Every time I look for him to be specific about his plans, he's not, he's just very vague and says what everyone wants to hear.Obama is a great speaker and has charisma, and that's what this campaign was about:style. It was not about substance. He had a personality cult, people fawning over him, and not questioning anything he did. His election was the closest thing to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.
He is not a grassroots president, Citigroup and Wall Street funded his campaign. Plus, there's the fact that he is related to Cheney, and by that account, Bush. Now some could say, it's just a coincidence,but I say not. Most of the presidents are distantly related to each other, and they're chosen way before you cast your vote.All of these elections are staged, to make you think you actually have some freedom. The only reason, in my opinion, that Sarah Palin was put into the race was to completely discredit McCain and make the people vote for Obama. See, McCain was too much like Bush, and Americans, I really don't think would have gone for another Bush term, so they had to put in someone a bit slicker. They knew the world is tired of old white guys, so here comes Obama, and I believe that if this economy gets worse, and we have a crisis, who is going to get the blame: Obama. Now I don't think he really cares about black people, he's one of those"Oh, we're all Americans., " but black people will have to pay for what he does. We also have to look at some of the people on his campaign: Kissinger, which if you do some research into him.....well, he's done so much dirty stuff I can't even really go into it. However, I believe he said something along the lines of how perfect Obama would be to establish the New World Order.(please google it)He's a stooge, listening to his advisers, and a puppet. Some say, well he may just do an about face, but what it takes to get power is what it takes to maintain power. He does what they tell him to do, and if he doesn't, well I could give you a nice list of assassinated leaders. At the end of the day, it's business as usual for the American Empire.